I've been thinking a lot about high control groups like Gracepoint, Berkland, Antioch Baptist Church, and many other evangelical churches. What makes a church a highly controlling one like Gracepoint and what makes members stay in such a controlling environment? These are complex questions, but I think it's worth thinking about because everyone can be susceptible to high control groups.
If you have left a high control group, please don't blame yourself or wallow in self-pity. Many smart, capable, and successful people have been conned into high control groups. Don't give them the power to ruin the rest of your life either. You can move on and build the life you want, the one God wants for you.
If you are IN a high control group, I urge you to ask yourself if staying in the group is really what you want and worth what it is costing you. Namely, your agency and freedom.
Ed Kang and Gracepoint posted in their response to the Christianity Today article that they condemn abuse of any kind. He denies that their church is spiritually abusive. Any egregious incidents are one offs and not a direct result of the culture Gracepoint creates. I maintain that Gracepoint and all affiliated ministries and churches, including its mother church Berkland, are spiritually abusive because of the high control nature of these organizations.
Ed and Kelly Kang joined, created, and maintain a high control group because they think that it is God's will and that it is biblical. They believe in the Koinonia Cross (see Rebekah Kim's PhD dissertation) and that church=god=family. They believe that all Christians should be bivocational and that church activities should be prioritized over basically everything else including biological family, career, and school.
According to them, if you really love God, you should cut your vacation short to attend their church events and limit going back home so that you can attend all church activities. You should want to stay around and not move back to your home town after graduating because God (read church) should be your priority. Not your career, not your biological family, and not any of your previous relationships including your previous church if you had one.
If you really love God, you should want to live with your class sisters/brothers because Koinonia Cross.
Everything becomes black and white.
Everything becomes about whether you love God or not.
Everything becomes a choice between God and sin.
By creating a dichotomy where it does not need to exist and painting things in black and white, Gracepoint makes it seem like you have to do almost everything according to what the church or your leader says. And this is one way that they slowly control most things about your life including how much sleep you get and what you are doing on Wednesday night.
MOST of life is in the grey. Most things are not a choice between loving God and committing sin. You can move back home and still love God. You can choose to not attend the All Teams Retreat and still be a spiritual person. You can get the rest you need and not be a lazy selfish person, full of sin. You can decide who you want to marry or date and that person can be a non GP member and you can still be a God honoring Christian. You can decide to love God by becoming a teacher or a doctor. You can decide to serve God by going back home and serving your home church (or another church or no church). You can do all these things and Gracepoint should not meddle because then they are getting between you and God.
God honors our agency. Even God honors our agency and that's why it cannot be in God's will that a church be highly controlling like GP. God wants us to CHOOSE how we live and how we love. That's why God gave us free will. If not, God would have created robots. But robots is what GP seems to want because they want to take all the messiness out of life and create a church planting machine, obedient followers who can move across the country if their church wants them to.
There can be no love without choice. And high control groups take away that choice through hierarchy, pressure, and norm setting. In theory all adults choose to do all the things they do every day. But if you look at social psychology, our behaviors are heavily influenced by many factors. By manipulating these outside factors and making you believe that GP's way is God's Way, GP eventually dictates who you live with, who your friends are, who you marry, how you spend your time, how you spend your money, and even where you work. They will tell you what you should wear and what kind of car you should drive.
If MOST of your life is being decided by what someone else wants you to do, then you have effectively lost your agency. The test to knowing if you have lost your agency is to decide to do something different and seeing what consequences arise. My experience in this church tells me that the consequences will be swift and severe.
So what causes smart adults to stay at a highly controlling church like Gracepoint? It's because they do not think that they are being controlled. They think that they are choosing this kind of life for themselves because they want to please God and the church says this is God's will for them.
But this is not what most folks sign up for when they choose to be Christians or when they decide to join a church.
When I was a part of this church, I thought in this black and white way too. I thought God wanted me to be a part of this church and that if I chose differently, that I was somehow sinning.
But that was not true. I had decided to be a Christian and to follow Jesus. I had decided to love God and God's people but I had not decided to do whatever the church told me to do via my assigned leaders.
There is a difference. There is a big difference between God's plan for your life and what the church or your leaders want you to do. Gracepoint will tell you that god=church=family and that your leaders are the voice of God for you. But this is not biblical and it is not true. I can love God and God's church but I should still have agency and choice over my life. And just because I decided to attend one church during college doesn't mean I have to stay there my whole life. And it is not unchristian to change churches. And changing my mind about what church I want to attend doesn't mean I love God less than those who stick with Gracepoint. The power to choose is a God given ability. Gracepoint should not take it away in God's name. This is how evil gets perpetuated so easily in high control groups, by slowly taking away people's agency and convincing them that this is God's will.
GP may claim that they're not spiritually abusive but there is no way they can reasonably and rationally deny that they are a highly controlling group. GP tries to control almost every aspect of a person's life. And the more you conform, the higher your status in GP and the more praise and affirmation you'll get from your leaders.
Don't let others define what your life should be. Don't confuse God's will with your church's agenda. God said don't have idols. Church can easily become an idol for Christians. It is for freedom that Christ has set us free. Let's be free. Free to love and to live the life that God had in mind for us. A life of joy. Not one of obligation.
I attended then-called Berkland after I moved back to Bay Area (my parents' house) after I graduated from another UC school, from about 2000 to 2012ish. Although I rolled my inner eyes every time they mentioned UC Berkeley as the best school in the entire galaxy, I was mature enough to know that my spiritual growth and faith did not depend on whether I felt included in the Berkeley-worship community. I stayed at Berkland, faithfully served, went to many short-term missions, and even went a year long overseas mission. I got to know MANY of the names mentioned here, and I made some great friends with a lot of people at Berkland.
ReplyDeleteAt the time of attending Berkland, I didn't think it was like a cult, but the pervasive feeling was that these people sure are just...so odd and weird..and not "attractive", as in, if they were to go out into the real world, I really don't think they'd have friends. Like friends of influential and substantial reputation. I mean, I laugh even as I write this right now...they were just DORKS. A weird, odd bunch living in a microcosm of ridiculous homogeneity (Driving that same ugly Quest? Wearing the same GAP denim button down?), incredibly dull and colorless (NONE of the people I knew had a hobby of any type....NONE), robotic (I don't recall anyone having any type of opinion of anything other than Jesus), and detached (again, I don't recall ONE INSTANCE the we ever discussed current events of any kind ever related to the world outside of the church. NEVER.
I just found it so odd that they can manage to have about 500 college students and young adults in a same building/church, and never discuss or get involved with social issues. OK, you can argue JOYLAND as "social service", but Bekland prided itself as "serving the community", rather than knowing what the heck is happening in the community.
I'm going to try to remember all the things that made me scratch my head. These are going to be random and seemingly comical, but I can attest to you, these are all true and witnessed by many who never speak up (or again, have a thought of their own):
1. Ed is a smart guy, and I truly respect him. I thought, and still think, that he has a gift of speaking, and I do believe he does have the heart to speak the truth and to teach the Word. With that said, Kelly is the head scratcher.
First off, she made sure to remind others periodically, that if she didn't marry Ed and to commit her life to ministry, that she will surely be a "CEO of a big corporation." Wow, am I supposed to be impressed with that??? When I first heard it, I thought it was sure douchey of her to say that, and after hearing it throughout the years, I concluded that that must be the reassurance she keeps repeating to herself to combat her own insecurities, or to assert that she is a lot more important than she actually is, or that's like a "self-talk" to feel like she's the female Apostle Paul or something (actually, Apostle Paul WAS like a "CEO of a big corporation" of his time, but he left that life and lived without a single boast of his own credentials or abilities).
2. Totally random: Kelly kept saying she coined the phrase "teachable moment", but it was actually first phrased by an educator Walter Brandenburg in 1917.
ReplyDelete3. But to be honest, I felt that God kept Kelly on "earth" with her back pains. Oh, thank God for her back pains...I can't imagine how much more she would've become so arrogant and haughty with her "wisdom" and "gift of teaching". God sees all things, and knows all things. Couldn't be truer in this instance.
4. The sisters I got to know...were just all weird and odd and did not belong to any normal circle of the society at large. Dang, these girls did not shave (eek, is that TMI?), shopped at God-knows-where (seriously, only God knew where), had ZERO fashion sense, most were out of shape, never had a boyfriend...I mean, just unattractive. And if they belonged to a cult, I'd say...let them.
5. And on the flip side, most guys were narcissistic. The worst was Tony Sun, he used to yell at sisters (yes, girls. He yelled at girls. Let that sink in.) all the time. One time he yelled/rebuked me when I walked into the room (thereby making a loud noise) during his prayer. Like...what? How was I to know he was praying??? To this day, I think of him as the biggest idiot.
Gosh, I have lots more to tell, especially about ministry stuff that I thought was super odd and weird. If there is interest, I will write them (as much as I could remember them).
Do share! Also, do you know about the subreddit?
Delete#4 has some misogynistic undertones... do not agree.
Delete#4 misogynistic? Sorry, didn't mean to sound misogynistic, but it was just how I saw it. The sisters were particularly not "living in the world", as in, purposely did not participate or agree with (and passive-aggessively regarded with disdain if a new comer came with some make-up on or some form-fitting fashionable clothing). What did Jesus teach about living "in" the world and "of" the world? These girls took it to the literal level, and lived without make-up (quite a bit Amish crazy), did not watch TV or movies, or listened to music (other than Steven Curtis Chapman, of which EVERYONE can sing along at any given moment). What does that sound to you? To me, it was crazy and unbelievable how they did not correctly understand Jesus' teaching.
DeleteOK...here are some more of the things I remember...
Delete6. 9/11/2001 The "sisters" came to the apartment I was sharing with other girls. We were going to do QT together in the early morning, with I think Ahmi leading (she's, for lack of a better word, a peculiar and "in her own little world"...and she never blended her bright pink blush and it sat in a round glop on her cheeks. I don't know which was worse...her clown dots or the awkward silence as none of the sisters told her how comical that looked).
It was 9/11 after the plane attacks that we were gathered, and as soon as we heard what happened, we turned on the TV to witness the horror. We sat in silence, some crying, all in disbelief and horror. After about an hour of watching, Ahmi suggested that we turn off the TV and finish our QT.
NOW, if you are a normal person, you'd suggest that we pray for the deceased, those who are suffering from this cruel and horrible attack. Anyone NORMAL will share about how this event tells how we need the love of Jesus our Savior.
BUT NOT THESE WEIRDOS. I forgot what text we read, but we went right into what it means to follow Jesus for ME. It was actually disturbing that NOBODY suggested praying for the horrific event that happened in mere hour ago. NOBODY. Whatever was happening in the world was WHOLLY AND EQUIVOCALLY DISREGARDED, and it was back to that damn feverish note journaling about some grace and faith BS. It's really scary how they are so detached from the real world. And they don't see it. Not even that kooky Ahmi can see it, if not, she's the worst.
I was truly disturbed about this. It was real cuckoo.
I haven't read through a lot of comments here, and I do feel I may be repeating what others have shared already, but here are some more of my memories of ridiculous Berkland culture.
ReplyDelete7. Perhaps my worst gripe has to be how the "leadership" tries to squeeze out every ounce of "free labor" from the small group members, calling it "serving attitude" and "serving heart that pleases Jesus." For instance. many of the older leaders had kids, and what do parents typically do if they want a take an evening to go somewhere? I mean, babysitting has to be common-sense budget item for every parent who wishes to leave their kids at home. Not BBC. They rigorously and obnoxiously "schedule" you to babysit the kids whenever they had a "staff meeting". I was unfortunately a young adult who had a job, and I was consistently placed in the babysitting lottery, between Patrick and Jeannie (Josiah...screaming and unruly), Tony and Michelle (their bathroom drawer had a roll of condoms...I wanted to run out of their house, screaming), Ben and (forgot the name of his wife), and some others.
NEVER MIND that I worked 8am-5pm, Monday to Friday. NEVER MIND that I had responsibilities that God blessed me with, a job that I need to excel in, as He placed that call for me. MANY MANY TIMES, the parents returned home around 2-3am in the morning, and left me to drive very drowsily back home. Oh, and let's not talk about how absolutely exhausted I was the next work day. Do these people have a conscience? Do these people have a realistic idea what they put members through? I mean, forget about telling them you can't babysit, Kelly herself will rebuke you and shame you in front of the entire sisters' meeting. It was so ridiculous and absolutely taking advantage.
One summer, I decided to quit my job and look for perhaps a new career path. So I thought. The "leaders" placed my name (without asking me, of course) as a "teacher" (more like babysitter) for their kids, calling it "Summer Academy". The leaders would drive their kids to church, and me and 4-5 other "victims" will "teach" (babysit) them practically all day. I didn't get ONE DAY to look into my career research. And I told ONE girl, ONE time, that I "couldn't wait until the day was over." Guess what? She told one of the leaders and I got rebuked very harshly for being "selfish" and "proud". The culture of snitching was very high, but of course, it's called keeping each other accountable.
8. The culture of exclusivity is also very high, and it cultivates very mean, insensitive, and inconsiderate environment. It also cultivates a toxic superiority complex. I was in a group of about 8 sisters. The leaders would "invite" the sisters, in secret (I just shake my head), who are deemed "ready" to write weekly reflections (from the sermon) and turn them in to the leaders by Friday. The thing is, when a sister gets invited to participate in this, it just bred some sick superiority complex, and of course, that always came to surface because BBC was that ugly environment.
ReplyDeleteI was sharing an apartment with 3 other girls, and one day I came home from work, and found all of them busily typing on their laptop. I asked them what they were doing, but they were a little hesitant to tell me. After a while, one of the girls said they were writing the sermon reflections. I felt like joining in, since they were all doing it, and started to type in my laptop. Then, one of the girls said, (and I vividly remember this word by word), "You don't have to do it. They won't read yours because they didn't ask you to write it." And I said, "I don't need them to read it. I can just do it for myself." Then she said, "You are not suppose to."
HUH??? The brainwashing of spiritual superiority was so nonsensical and embarrassing. I guess reflecting about what I learned about Jesus was on "permission" basis. What was I thinking.
9. I know this has been addressed elsewhere - several times, exhaustively - but I gotta talk about BBC's near "obsession" to have members get baptized, or "re-baptized". I got baptized when I was 16 years old, and I unequivocally consider it genuine and as spiritually significant as any other's baptism, and I see it Biblically incorrect to get baptized "again". I was under Michelle Sun's leadership/babysitting rotation, and she questioned my baptism, at first subtly and indirectly, but gradually more directly, if not in an absolute directive.
ReplyDeleteShe first asked me if I had the mental and emotional capacity to understand baptism at the ripe age of 16. Of course, I did. She also questioned my spiritual maturity to understand baptism at that age, and I said even if I was not as mature, I was 100% ready and willing to commit to Jesus my Savior. She carried on these ridiculous line of questioning for a long while, making jabs here and there as much as opportunity arose for her to comment on my "questionable" baptism.
It took about couple of years for her to feel bold enough to just tell me, "You should get baptized again because I feel your first one was not genuine." I was tempted to say, "My baptism is none of your business to feel or to deem it whatever that you wish to." When I told her "No", I was called into Kelly's house a week later, to have a one-to-one session with Kelly. She also told me to get baptized again, for various reasons that sounded like she was calling herself a prophetess and that she knew everything (oh, the nerve of her to do this for so many years, and for people to be brainwashed and go along with everything she said). I said "No" to her as well, and they tried other leaders (Esther, Matthew and his wife Helen, and even Hope? from UCD). But I firmly said "No", and did not budge. Then I got branded as a "difficult" one, and was told that I was once on the path to being asked to become "staff", but they felt that I've "changed" and that I need more discipline as a servant of God. I cringe at these memories.
This type of thing was very common. Thanks for sharing.
Delete